This year is the 150th anniversary of the creation of Colorado. We're known as the Centennial State, because we are the only state in the union that was established on the U. S. centennial. Between this auspicious anniversary and that of the U. S., celebrations are planned for this summer all over the state.
Colorado is a state with a storied history. These lands - being rich in resources and beauty, and on the U. S. frontier in the late nineteenth century - seemed to attract all sorts of interesting people who came here for largely economic reasons. Before Anglo-Americans arrived, the region was home to several indigenous cultures, people who were displaced and murdered for the wealth that was to be exploited by the colonizers. Some of our history is truly shameful, and still there are stories to be told about remarkable people doing remarkable things. Part of our "official" celebration is to platform the histories of all people who have historically called this region home, along with recognizing that our shared history is how we make decisions about our future that reflect our values of human rights, ecological conservation, and the rule of law.
For all of these things, I'm pretty proud of my (second) home state.
I simply must have a new patriotic frock.
And 1876 is the problem. Those of us engaged in sartorial history generally divide the last quarter of the nineteenth century into four eras. Early Bustle is 1870 - 1876; Natural Form is 1877-1882, and Late Bustle is 1883-1889, while the Belle Epoch is 1890-1900. The change between each dress era is pretty dramatic. Well, all but the first two.
There seems to be a transitional period of 1874-1876, in which the skirt silhouette changed from bustle to slope, and not fitted in the derrière and thighs. 1876 fashion plates show the cuirass bodice of the upcoming Natural Form style over this new skirt shape. The rear silhouette no longer featured the elevated rump; instead there is a long continuous line from narrow waist to floor or beyond to the end of the train.
The "princess" or polonaise style was also popular in 1876, long bodices which transitioned into drapery below the waist, worn over the same skirt shape. Overskirts and polonaise fronts are longer than seen earlier in the Early Bustle era.
While both of these styles bore some resemblance to the dress eras that bracketed 1876, they are clearly not typical of either of them.
Some original skirt/overskirt and polonaise patterns are available for these transitional years, however modern patterns have skipped this transition almost entirely. To be fair, there were still a few full bustle skirts in 1876, but the trend away from the bustle is clear. Truly Victorian has one 1876 skirt (TV 216, the Parisian Trained Skirt) which seems to have the current base form, but with an excess of embellishment. TV carries the classic cuirass bodice from which all kinds of modifications can be made to neckline, hemline, and sleeves - it will do perfectly for 1876.
Now, to find it.
It took some time and a lot of search terms, but I have indeed secured one, in size 14. Unopened and uncut. I feel like a lucky girl, even though the price has increased somewhat from the 1970's list price. While I may have to grade parts of it, I expect that (for the bodice anyway) it will be mostly a process of applying shape changes to TV 420B, the 1879 Cuirass bodice. Photos of women in 1876 show that the skirt of the cuirass bodice does not have to fit the hips so carefully. Skirts are easy to grade. I'm eagerly awaiting its arrival, and hoping that it's a bit like opening Janet Arnold.
Who, by the way, also skips 1876; however, the 1878 day dress in Patterns of Fashion 2 looks remarkably similar to POH 1876, if the POH dress was one piece.
I do have one other book which might be of help. Frances Grimble's (for whom I admit to having few charitable feelings) Fashions of the Gilded Age Vol 1 has the trained petticoat in it which supports those long sloping skirts. I know this, because I've made one - before I lost the book somewhere.
Try to find that one; it's out of print. There's one on ebay for <koffs> $331 USD. The good news is that it's readily available through ILL, and so I'm eagerly awaiting its arrival.
A lot of research and a plan is beginning to come together, however nebulous it may be. I've decided to use the POH 1876 pattern as a jumping off point. I have in my stash an indigo blue 19th-century style cotton print and a length of striped cotton in red, white, indigo, and Wedgewood blue. I'd prefer the bodice and overskirt to be the blue, which leaves the stripe for the foundation skirt and cuff/collar trimmings. I also have a great gob of netting lace and cotton embroidered lace which I want to deploy as in Figure 1. I'm largely interested in the ornate necklines and sleeve cuffs as illustrated in contemporary fashion plates, and the decorative possibilities of cutting that stripe on the bias for flounces and ruches.
I'm making some ribbon cockades in Colorado colors - red, white, blue, and gold for decorative elements, and I'm considering other ways to bring gold into the r/w/b scheme. Small gold picture buttons are on order, picturing little birds perched on a twig.
For undergarments, I will need to make a new long ruffled petticoat. I'm certain that I can make some significant improvements on the one I made long ago.
Sew patriotic, right? I can find no evidence that women wore these colors in commemoration 150 years ago. However, I'm planning on this ensemble to get a good workout this year, perhaps with a less obviously patriotic underskirt next year.
